DEMENTIA VERSUS ALZHEIMERS: A POST TO REMEMBER 

“YOU DON’T STOP LAUGHING BECAUSE YOU GROW OLD, YOU GROW OLD BECAUSE YOU STOP LAUGHING”

My grandfather used to have a crude, erring on vulgar, blunt, but charming sense of humor. The stiff and frigid demeanor football fans remember him for, from the 1970’s-1990’s on the sidelines as an NFL head coach, as he scrutinized without expression his football players from kickoff to the last seconds of the fourth quarter, with his arms crossed tightly across his chest, while viciously chewing a piece of gum, his stark blue eyes sharply focused only on the field, shadowed by an intimidating set of eyebrows, stands in stark contrast to his tone at home. During the game he masked his thoughts with an unfaltering pokerface; he never let a quick smirk slip across his face or his posture slump. He wanted to be seen as the tough, takes no shit from anyone, head coach and his portrayal of this during games was impeccable. Never a chuckle or smile–he was definitely not a Pete Carroll. But in locker rooms, at the parties after the games, with colleagues, and even with his own football players (to a degree) he was personable and charismatic. “Chuck Knox was the best coach I ever had,” said one of his former Rams players, Tom Mack, a Hall of Famer.  “He always took the time to know each player well enough that he could talk to each player and hit their hot buttons. I never saw another coach like that.” So, while in the locker room, he was tough but loved, during games the fans mostly saw an austere coach with meticulous focus and dedicated persistence.



But at home he wasn’t that tough, intimidating coach. He was Pop-Pop, full of sharp dad jokes and witty cliches–not the Knoxisms he was known for but punny humor that would make us roll our eyes. He was always trying to make us laugh. And even if we didn’t, he would. He’d always chuckle after delivering a line and was always trying to be the funny Pop-Pop for my sister and I–embarassing us whenever there was an opportunity to do so. Not the Chuck Knox who, with 8 simple words, admonished 300 pound 6-foot tall Cortez Kennedy to get out of his office when the Tez mouthed back one day: “Get out of my office right now Cortez,” as quoted by Kennedy himself during his induction into Pro Football’s Hall of Fame.

No we didn’t see that growing up. I grew up with the Chuck Knox who was my Pop Pop that took me for golf cart rides and would surprise us by stepping on the cart’s horn button, located on the floor next to the brake pedal unbeknownst to us, “beep beep” causing us to shriek “where’d that come from Pop-Pop?” He’d just chuckle. Or musically reciting “open sesame” in a mysterious tone when we got to the gate that led to my grandparents’ home, and magically the gate would open. Our mouths would be open: “Pop Pop how did you do that?” “Magic,” he’d chuckle. The remote to the gate, I later learned, would be tucked out-of-sight in his pant pocket. But in high school I became that socially anxious teen and would duck below the windows when he came to pick me up in his tan Cadillac; I didn’t want any classmates seeing me in this horrible vehicular choice. It just screamed elderly uncoolness, even though looking back I’m sure many dads or football fans would have proudly ridden front seat of that car.



My grandpa’s chuckle–one that is so recognizable it should be called the “Chuck”-le–used to resonate from deep within his chest and was a perfect rendition of the ubiquitous “he he” texts we now send. He was always “Chuck”-ling. But he doesn’t anymore.

Read on to learn about various forms of dementia, and the type my grandfather has, or skip ahead if uninterested in the details of dementia’s wide-ranging presentations.


Dementia is not the equivalent of Alzheimer’s. Just as a square is a type of rectangle but a rectangle is not a square, Alzheimer’s Disease is a form of dementia but dementia is not necessarily Alzheimer’s.

And this is the case in a significant amount of patients to warrant discussion. Most MDs, from my experience, are too exhausted, too sleep-deprived and time-constrained, to explain the varied presentations of dementia. After all, they only have, on average, 30-45 minutes to review a patient’s chart, enter that staged examination room, and jump straight to the point: discuss any new symptoms, review the patients meds, prescribe any new meds, word the pros and cons of each pill in a way the patient (or his/her caregiver) understands, write the script, schedule a follow-up, followed by 15 minutes of hastily summarizing the visit in the electronic medical record system, the notes of which are always subject to higher review. There’s not much time for chit-chat let alone medical lessons.


So here’s what you should know about dementia: it’s widely diverse manifestations and underlying pathologies. Don’t worry, I’ll leave out as much medical jargon as possible.

First, let’s review what we know to date about the brain and it’s basic machinery. The brain can be broken up into specific areas and each area serves a distinct purpose. Nevertheless, while the parts of a car can be separated, a motor vehicle cannot function if one piece of machinery is missing, or if the wires have been cut. Because the car won’t be able to start unless its parts communicate with each other, through these wires, to allow for the engine to start, the radio to blast, and the brakes to halt the car’s forward momentum if a threat appears. The brain operates similarly. It’s a team effort that enables us to remember the names of our closest friends, what time we need to make that appointment, and recognize the feeling of fear when walking alone at night and faint footsteps, close behind us, trail our path. Collaboration is key to any meaningful bodily or cognitive action and impulse. And just like a car, while communication is key, each piece of machinery serves an essential purpose. The brain, composed of disparate lobes and structures, is constructed similarly. While car parts can be stolen and sold, they won’t be valuable unless wired into a car complete with all the remaining parts. So, fundamentally, the brain is useless when a lobe is damaged or its wiring is cut. The brain must be complete with all functioning lobes and structures wired together to form a circuit in order for the brain to be whole, capable of effective execution of purposeful action.


Wiring together the individual sections of the brain during infantile and adolescent growth is crucial to producing efficient and effective actions, decisions, thoughts, and, ultimately, a useful human being able to function properly–eat, laugh, socialize, correctly interpret the intent of others’ words or the subliminal message conveyed through facial expressions, develop relationships, reproduce, parent, cope with life’s ups and its downs, grieve, deny, challenge, accept, and prepare for our own disappearance from the world our brains built.

An abnormality in one area of the brain has a limited impact on one of these abilities–including speech and memory–specific to its assigned role in the circuitry that affords the brain as the body’s most powerful organ.


The lobes of the brain:

  • Frontal: thinking, memory, behavior, personality, decision-making, movement
  • Temporal: hearing, learning, emotions
  • Parietal: language and touch
  • Occipital: eyesight
lobes

Two anatomically and structurally separate formations that are critical to brain function are the brain stem and the cerebellum. You can think of these structures as similar to the pit of a peach: the peach is anatomically partitioned into pit and the pulp. And the pit can easily be removed before consumption. So we have other structures aide the brain in functioning prosperously:

  • Brain stem: breathing, heart rate, temperature
  • Cerebellum: balance and coordination

In the temporal areas of the brain reside the amygdala and hippocampus, cognitive “organs” that are embedded within the brain:

  • The Amygdala: nuclei within the temporal lobes important for memory, decision-making, and emotional reactions as part of the limbic system (don’t worry about this medical term–just remember that it’s our brain’s emotional wiring system.)
  • The hippocampus: located in the temporal lobes, functions within the limbic system, and is important for short-term and long-term memory (in Alzheimer’s Disease the hippocampus is the first area of the brain to suffer damage.)

OK so now–before I forget—back to dementia:

Alzheimer’s Disease

Most common type of dementia; accounts for an estimated 60 to 80 percent of cases.

Symptoms: Difficulty remembering recent conversations, names or events is often an early clinical symptom; apathy and depression are also often early symptoms. Later symptoms include impaired communication, poor judgment, disorientation, confusion, behavior changes and difficulty speaking, swallowing and walking.

Brain changes: Hallmark abnormalities are deposits of the protein fragment beta-amyloid (plaques) and twisted strands of the protein tau (tangles) as well as evidence of nerve cell damage and death in the brain

Vascular Dementia

Previously known as multi-infarct or post-stroke dementia, vascular dementia is less common as a sole cause of dementia than Alzheimer’s, accounting for about 10 percent of dementia cases.

Symptoms: Impaired judgment or ability to make decisions, plan or organize is more likely to be the initial symptom, as opposed to the memory loss often associated with the initial symptoms of Alzheimer’s. Occurs from blood vessel blockage or damage leading to infarcts (strokes) or bleeding in the brain. The location, number and size of the brain injury determines how the individual’s thinking and physical functioning are affected.

Brain changes: Brain imaging can often detect blood vessel problems implicated in vascular dementia. In the past, evidence for vascular dementia was used to exclude a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (and vice versa). That practice is no longer considered consistent with pathologic evidence, which shows that the brain changes of several types of dementia can be present simultaneously. When any two or more types of dementia are present at the same time, the individual is considered to have mixed dementia.

Dementia with Lewy Bodies

Symptoms: People with dementia with Lewy bodies often have memory loss and thinking problems common in Alzheimer’s, but are more likely than people with Alzheimer’s to have initial or early symptoms such as sleep disturbances, well-formed visual hallucinations, and slowness, gait imbalance or other parkinsonian movement features.

Brain changes: Lewy bodies are abnormal aggregations (or clumps) of the protein alpha-synuclein. When they develop in a part of the brain called the cortex, dementia can result. Alpha-synuclein also aggregates in the brains of people with Parkinson’s disease, but the aggregates may appear in a pattern that is different from dementia with Lewy bodies.

The brain changes of dementia with Lewy bodies alone can cause dementia, or they can be present at the same time as the brain changes of Alzheimer’s disease and/or vascular dementia, with each abnormality contributing to the development of dementia. When this happens, the individual is said to have mixed dementia.

Frontotemporal Dementia

Includes dementias such as behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD), primary progressive aphasia, Pick’s disease, corticobasal degeneration and progressive supranuclear palsy.

Symptoms: Typical symptoms include changes in personality and behavior and difficulty with language. Nerve cells in the front and side regions of the brain are especially affected.

Brain changes: No distinguishing microscopic abnormality is linked to all cases. People with FTD generally develop symptoms at a younger age (at about age 60) and survive for fewer years than those with Alzheimer’s.

Briefly, for completeness, Parkinson’s Disease produces dementia symptomatically similar to Lewy Body Dementia. There are several other lesser-known types of dementia: Huntington’s Disease, Wernicke-Korsakoff Syndrome (the most interesting, in my opinion,) and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease among others.


So patients with Lewy Body Dementia behave differently than patients with Alzheimer’s disease but similarly to those with Parkinson’s disease and it’s all explained by the underlying damage to the brain. Lumping all memory-deficit diseases together into a single category of “dementia” or assuming all patients with dementia have Alzheimer’s is hugely errant and detrimental to both patients and their caregivers since each type must be managed markedly differently. Further, caregivers should know which type of dementia their loved one or patient has in order to know what to expect.


I am the product of two very dissimilar families: football/sports and the highest level of education, consisting of doctors and lawyers. So, for a long time the Knox family, my mom’s side of the family who has no medical education, ignored the progressive decline in my grandather’s mental state–they wrote it off as simply age-related forgetfulness. Until he left $1000 in cash on the table of an NFL monthly alumni event and a month or so later crashed that beige Cadillac into another car while making a simple left turn at a minor four-way intersection. That’s when they started to listen to my father’s medical remarks and opinion.


My father, a family practice physician, has witnessed my grandfather’s mental decline from afar, as my parents divorced when I was 13 and my grandfather’s mental disabilities didn’t manifest until I was 16 or 17 years old. It wasn’t until my Pop-Pop made that error in judgment to turn left into oncoming traffic in his Cadillac that my grandmother took action, permanently revoking his access to the car keys. He still could drive the golf cart though, she gave him that–he didn’t have dementia, she said, it was just “age.” Even at 16 I didn’t agree with her “diagnosis.” I argued repeatedly with her: “he needs to see a doctor Mimi. He might have Alzheimer’s”; I didn’t know at that age the fundamental take-home message of this post that dementia is not necessarily always Alzheimer’s. Regardless, I printed off articles and pages describing support groups and handed them to my Mimi to read but she disregarded them and they ended up in the trash, literally. I think, in hindsight, she was going through the stages of grief as his wife. First, denial. Second, Anger. Third, bargaining. That’s what stage she was at: he couldn’t drive the Cadillac but he could drive the golf cart, he couldn’t drink hard liquor anymore but he could sip wine. She even thought he could still dress himself until it took increasingly longer for him to do so with one memorable occasion being his choice to wear his old Rams tracksuit to dinner at the Country Club, complete with the matching hat. “Chuck! You can’t wear that to the Club! Go back in and put on your Tommy Bahama shirt.” I couldn’t decide if it was total obliviousness or denial.


Then it got worse. And, since I lived with them, I saw the step-wise decline in his memory, speech, personal care, and what MDs call “ADLs” or Activities of Daily Living firsthand. First he couldn’t brush his teeth or shave. Then he couldn’t dress himself. Then he couldn’t use the bathroom by himself. That “Chuck”-le slowly dissipated. Then it was gone.


Finally a research group from UCLA made the trip to La Quinta and delivered their preliminary diagnosis of Lewy Body Dementia. So after years, my grandma’s denial, anger, and bargaining finally shifted. To acceptance.


Before I even enrolled in med school, I educated myself about Lewy Body Dementia. Those shuffling footsteps we used to joke about, “Well, here comes Pop-Pop,” got louder and that suddenly made sense. His gradual stooping posture, no longer that stiff board stance seen on sidelines, made sense. But it was his night terrors that, for me, incited anger in me, directed at my Mimi for not doing something sooner.

Recurrent nightmares, something that had always interrupted his sleep, became much more severe and frequent. I was often awoken in the middle of the night by my grandmother to help her calm my grandfather down as he unconsciously stood next to their bed, his arms raised, fists clenched–he would be reliving a fight from back when he was a teen in Sewickley, Pennsylvania with an abusive alcoholic father to drag home from bars when his mother ordered him to do so. They had no windows in their home they were so poor. No phone. Linoleum floors. And a rough neighborhood where you had to learn to be street-smart and tough to survive until you turned 18 and could finally work in the steel mills or join the army (my grandfather tried when he was 15 but they discovered his age and turned him away.)

The night terrors got worse. My Pop-Pop who used to take me for date shakes and golf cart rides and say to me “if you ever need anything who do you call?” “Pop-Pop” was suffering. And there was nothing I could do but dodge his asleep punches, make sure he didn’t fall–which he often did–and hit his head, and try to get him back to bed, reminding him that he wasn’t in Sewickley anymore. He was in a million dollar house he earned from years of hard work, and he was safe. But it took a lot of convincing and sometimes lasted hours, at 3 or 4 in the morning.


My grandma is a humble, modest, and strong woman. But eventually it was too much for her to handle alone with only help from my sister and I. So, the house my grandfather had built as a final demonstration, mostly to himself, that he had “made it,” a place to retire and live out the rest of his years in peace was sold and they moved; I don’t think his weakened brain was even able to process the transition. A multi-million dollar house, built on two lots and custom-designed and constructed, was traded in for a one-bedroom cottage in Anaheim.


My grandfather used to shoulder all familial responsibilities, which ranged from financial duties to making sure all of us in the family were thriving in our lives, fell to my grandmother who initially didn’t know anything about how to manage these newfound responsibilities. I think she was shocked then confused then overwhelmed–but she never showed it, out of shame would be my best guess since she has never complained and rarely have I seen her cry.

She still hides her emotions from everyone including me and purposefully conceals aspect of my grandfathers’s decline from anyone outside of our family and close-knit circle of friends. In fact, she’d be horrified if she knew I had written this post, especially online. But I don’t blame her. She grew up in a time when mental illness was always hidden and protected privately. At 83 I don’t expect her to suddenly develop the awareness that times have changed. That not only is dementia but mental illness overall is also frequently openly discussed and accepted.


So she continues to “protect” him from what she fears might be “judgment”; she says she wants everyone to remember him for how he used to be and not think of the state he is in now once he is gone. This weight of shielding him away from the public has taken its toll on her. She doesn’t laugh much anymore and my grandfather can now only speak a few sentences at a time–and that’s on good days. She still refuses to embrace the notion that he won’t be remembered for having dementia; even if everyone knew he would still be remembered for being a fucking talented NFL head coach who set records and might even make induction into that Hall in Canton one day.


But I wish she would acknowledge that times have changed and that the vast majority of people–fans, old acquaintances, former staff members–would be accepting of who he is now. They wouldn’t expect that same charismatic sociable Chuck Knox of the 1970’s. It’s ok for him to be around fans; that won’t change how they’ll remember him. Not only would allowing him to leave their gated community every once in a while, under the supervision of his caregivers, or attend an LA Rams game help stimulate his now mostly vacant mind but it would also help others struggling in similar situations with ill family members or friends. But she won’t and I don’t think ever will.


Whenever I visit, his blue eyes regain focus. He always kisses me and he always grabs my hand before I walk away. And he always meticulously whispers, “I love you.” That’s what he says now when I leave. But I know he’s trying to say what he used to always say, “I love you more than anything–you know that.” He recalls, he just can’t remember. The words are there but jumbled and it’s too hard for him to make sense of the mess; like a game of Scramble, the words are there but need to be sorted and made sense of before expressed. I always know what he’s trying to say and my Mimi does too; he’s always trying to tell her how much he loves her.


But, “It’s just too hard,” she says at any suggestion of wheeling him to familiar places or events–like football games. Instead he spends his days in a comfortable chair, pouring confusedly at old pictures, his face un-purposefully expressionless, across from a TV broadcasting a football game.


The laughter is gone but he’s still here. It’s OK for people to know that dementia, in all forms, can impact anyone and their family–even ones who led incredibly public and colossal lives.


Dementia is no laughing matter. But those who are still living with it should not be buried just yet. For the brain and for those who suffer from dementia, isolation is essentially burial.


CTE? Check out my other blog post.

WALL STREET JOURNAL: MED SCHOOL BURNOUT 

PROGNOSES FOR BURNT-OUT MED STUDENTS AND THEIR PATIENTS

https://blogs.wsj.com/experts/2017/09/12/how-medical-schools-can-better-fight-burnout/

MED SCHOOL BURNOUT PRODUCES INEFFECTIVE UNENGAGED MEDICAL STUDENTS AND ULTIMATELY POOR MDS.

A problem that needs to be addressed and appropriately managed. Open discussion and encouragement of such discussion should be implemented by all medical schools.

Better mental health care for medical students, ditching the mental health stigma, and employment of mental health resources for medical students will lead to better prognoses for not only burgeoning physicians but for their patients.

MY MEDICAL SCHOOL INTERVIEWS

HOW BOB DYLAN HELPED ME GET INTO MED SCHOOL

Applying to medical school is a long, arduous, complicated, and expensive process. Throughout undergrad, I constantly analyzed every choice I made–what courses “look good” on those sheets of paper submitted to medical schools, what community service activities or leadership roles would the admissions committee “want to see” more than others. I did this too often. 

And I regret it. I regret not taking that journalism class or that anthropology elective. Or that sociology lecture or that political science group discussion. Or joining that art club or swim group. Or taking the time to rally with other students around a political issue or campaign for a non-medical-related cause. The list could make a book. If it didn’t link directly or somehow creatively indirectly with medicine I probably didn’t do it–but I should have. I locked myself into a medical crate and quasi-permanently chained myself to a professional pole, without even once remotely realizing I had limited myself in, what now seems, an irrevocable way.


I did deviate a few times; there were a couple instances in which I did leap over this subconsciously constructed mental gate, but these deviations were mostly during my Freshman and Sophomore years when I had that wiggle room and not that load that comes with the looming deadline to dominate the MCAT. I took a human rights class. I loved it so I took a legal studies class next. But there wasn’t–or didn’t seem to be–enough time to be a legal humanitarian and a pre-med student so that was the end of my short-lived legal career. I took a philosophy course and loved it–but the concept that the inanimate objects around us might not actually exist conflicted too much with the “facts” I was learning in Physics. So, again, at some non-existent academic fork in the road, I chose science once more. I did stick with French for a year–until the course requirements to major in molecular biology, and their available time slots, barred me from continuing the only 5 unit class on campus, since all foreign language classes required an hour-long commitment at the same time every Monday through Friday. Whenever I tried to “explore” other realms of thought there was an inherent conflict during enrollment that forced me to choose: science or these other electives that might not take me anywhere professionally.

Same went for volunteering or leadership positions. No medical school wanted to admit a politician or columnist, did they? Not unless the columnist zeroed in on discussions based only on current healthcare issues, I thought. So I chose science time and time again, although sometimes I decided to swim upstream toward something that interested me instead of leisurely floating downstream in a scientifically inflated raft.


I diverged from the “perfect medical school application” stream in one significant way. I tangentially decided to found and instruct an English Department-sponsored course on the music and lyrics of Bob Dylan and their influence on American history, society, and culture. But I didn’t decide to do this in some conscious rebellion against my predetermined professional fate to become a doctor. I did it because it confused and infuriated me that there was a class on the Beatles and Pink Floyd but not Bob Dylan–how fucking ridiculous. How could there not be a class on Bob Dylan at fucking UC Berkeley of all places? Brown had a class and so did Columbia. But not Berkeley? Well then I was going to start one.


So I spent an entire summer re-reading every Bob Dylan book I owned, every interview with Dylan since 1961, every article about him I could find. And eventually compiled a class reader–it was thick–and course curriculum that spanned Dylan’s 50 year career that continued to dominate any contemporary band’s weak attempts at music, in my opinion. It took me all fucking summer and swallowed up all the time I wasn’t spending trying to wrap my head around biochemistry; I had wanted to get that difficult biochem class out of the way since I had heard it was much easier to get an A in this challenging pre-med pre-req when burnt-out professors just didn’t give two shits in the summer.

The final stamp of approval, before I submitted my curriculum draft to the meticulous eyes of the English Department, had to come from Greil Marcus. Per Wikipedia, “Greil Marcus (born June 19, 1945) is an American author, music journalist and cultural critic. He is notable for producing scholarly and literary essays that place rock music in a broader framework of culture and politics than is customary in pop music journalism.” He was a professor at Berkeley at the time and is still the leading Bob Dylan expert in the country. He’s written two books on Dylan and has even presented an award to Dylan in person.HAD TO meet Marcus and I wanted his approval. So we met at Caffe Strada and he told me his story. Marcus was the first Records Editor at Rolling Stone Magazine. Jann Wenner–the founder of Rolling Stone Magazine–was Marcus’s best friend–still is–and roommate when they were both Berkeley students years back. He shared so many immersive stories, I never wanted to leave that table at Strada. He told me the trouble him and Jann used to get into at Berkeley. How after he gave Dylan an award, he asked if Dylan had read his biography on him, how Dylan had said he did but “he got a few things wrong and should write another one.” So Marcus did. And when he did he sent Dylan’s manager a note, asking for a quote from Bobby. He got a letter back from Dylan’s manager: “Bob doesn’t have anything to add. He said: ‘you know more about his life than he does.'” I couldn’t believe who I was sitting across from but in the end what mattered most was Marcus’s approval. And after two tense silent minutes of anxiously sipping coffee across from my one direct link to Dylan, while Greil read over my curriculum and flipped through my reader, He finally spoke. He smiled and chuckled. And nodded in agreement. “I think Dylan would approve.” That was good enough for me.

loved creating that class out of thin air. I had decided I would abide by Dylan’s own rules and respect his spiteful remarks over the course of five decades and center the class around individual interpretation rather than on trying to “pigeon-hole”–in Dylan’s words–Dylan and his impact on music and society at large. Fortunately for me, Greil and the English Department agreed with my thoughts. And a Berkeley English professor who typically lectured on American literary culture decided to sponsor my initiative. I recruited my friend Natasha to help in the course’s actual execution and while we knew the class would be popular we didn’t anticipate how many other students wanted a class on Bob Dylan as well.

Initially, we had pitched the class to the English Department as a 2-unit upper division course with around 75 students enrolled. Instead, over 100 signed up and we thought “what the hell” and capped the class at 110 students. So 110 students showed up to an auditorium in the School of Journalism building once a week for 4 hours. It was awesome. After one particularly loud lecture, a professor at the School of Journalism actually burst in and threw a tantrum, threatening to report us to the school. We won that argument and received a signed email of apology a week later.

We hosted guest speakers I didn’t even initially imagine we’d be able to enlist–including THE Ben Fong-Torres. That’s right. Ben Fong-Fucking-Torres. Same Ben Fong-Torres you might’ve seen portrayed in the film Almost Famous. “Hello, this is Ben Fong-Torres calling from Rolling Stone Magazine. Is this William Miller?” THE former fucking editor of Rolling Stone Magazine, editor of Rolling Stone when it was in its glory days of the late 1960’s and early 1970’s. THAT SAME BEN FONG-TORRES. I still have him saved as a contact in my phone–just in case. I’ve always been concerned that I might make the poor decision to dial him early one morning after too many vodka sodas and an intoxicated run-in with other Dylan enthusiasts at a bar. But I haven’t–yet at least.


It was a fantastic experience and I’ve never regretted it. When I applied to medical school I, of course, included it in my application under “Leadership Experience,” but I mostly wrote it off as just another piece of cotton in my application–something to fluff up the pillow a bit. A little “off topic” but “hmm..interesting. I don’t think we have another Bob Dylan enthusiast in our applicant pool,” I hoped one admissions committee member would think to themselves when perusing the final submission of my every decision over the course of 4 years.

But it ended up not being just a minor application plumper. It actually was the one thing every single medical school asked me during that significant final step in getting into an MD program: The Interview.

At all five institutions that invited me to fly to their school–on my dime by the way–to put the final stamp on that envelope and mail it in to receive my MD, asked me about this class I had started–why had I started it? Did I enjoy teaching it? When did I first start listening to Dylan? Wasn’t I a bit young to be a Dylan fan? The interview would suddenly take an informal and cheerful turn and there was often several moments of shared laughter and mutual agreement between the interviewer and myself. All of them, not surprisingly (you’d have to be a fucking idiot not to and what are the odds that a high-up member of the staff at a top medical school in the US was entirely intellectually limited) were Dylan fans.

It ended up not being just a talking point but a way for me to take off that constricting conservative blazer and for the interviewer to shed the formality of his or her white coat and for us to, metaphorically, share a joint while enjoying some Dylan music as two human beings with a shared interest. Suddenly the situation would turn from some aging MD asking me routine questions to me sitting with someone who I just realized was a Dylan fan too and discussing which Dylan song was our favorite, as if over glasses of beer at a dive bar. It provided much needed comedic relief to the coldness that had moments before held the conversation in an uncomfortably stiff grip.


I wish, not just for that reason, that I had deviated from that typical pre-med student path more often. I wish that I had taken more varied courses, in a broader range of Berkeley academic departments. Because now, when I’ve finally closed that door on being a “fucking doctor” instead of some “fucking writer,” as my father would say, most of my experiences have only been medical-related. I should have spent more time exploring the different paths that were so opportunistically right in front of my eyes. This is one of the unavoidable faults of medicine; we admit students who lack the varied experiences that are often so important in being able to relate to others–specifically patients. I was blinded by the idea of becoming an MD and I let it consume most of the best four years of my life. College is the best four years of anyone’s life and you should appreciate every second of it without blinders on.


But I did start that Bob Dylan class. And with that deviation and experience came some of the most awesome memories of my life thus far. I actually think I’m prouder of starting that class than I am of getting into medical school.


Strange, isn’t it? How some minor decision can alter life in such a major way and leave an impressive imprint on your future?

In the end, when you’re on your deathbed, will you remember the names of every MD who ever treated you? Who added those days to your life? Probably not. Instead, you’ll most likely revive the names of every friend who made each of those days worth it. Because, we’ll “meet them all again on the long journey to the middle.”


“I always tell the girls never take it seriously. If you never take it seriously, you never get hurt. If you never get hurt, you always have fun. And if you ever get lonely, you can just go to the record store and visit your friends.”

STRANGER THINGS: THE MONTAUK PROJECT AND MKULTRA 

THE SCIENTIFICALLY STRANGE HISTORY BEHIND NETFLIX’S HIT SHOW

If you haven’t already binge-watched, with reproachfully debasing interruptions from Netflix (“are you still watching?” Your reflection glaring back at you in disappointment,) the cult phenomena that is Stranger Things, you should set aside an hour–or 10–to begin Season 1 of the series before your friends begin discussion of Season 2 over draft beers. For starters, because it’s inexplicably addicting even if you aren’t a sci-fi fan. And secondly because it’s deeply rooted in conspiracist-propagated “true” events that supposedly began in the early 1980’s. I won’t include any spoilers but will delve into the show’s inspiration and foundation: the Montauk Project. In fact, writers pitched the show under the working title “MONTAUK.” But what’s eerier is the show’s mirroring of actual government sanctioned experiments that occurred over the course of several decades: the CIA’s implementation of MKUltra. It’s probably even stranger.

Prepare yourself because both stories–if true–are disturbing, wholly unethical to be modest, and makes you think “fuck if this happened then was 9/11 really a conspiracy theory? Oh fuck what about JFK?” You might consider packing a small lightweight suitcase, putting it under your bed, and carrying your passport in your wallet from now on “just in case.” Then you’ll probably start applying tape over your MacBook’s camera while jacking off to porn and unscrewing all your lightbulbs and demantling your iPhone to search for tiny wiretaps too (OK one spoiler–sorry.) But before you walk yourself into paranoia and a diagnosis of psychosis just yet, take a Xanax (just kidding…but really you should consider getting some) and read on.

The first is another story not unlike Area 51, involving space aliens and outrageous experimentation–all performed on a U.S. military base.

The second details experimentation on human subjects without their consent, government cover-ups, and disappearing documents.

So let me open your curiosity door and let’s learn a little about “Papa”…


THE MONTAUK PROJECT 

The Montauk Project was an alleged series of covert United States government projects conducted at Camp Hero or Montauk Air Force Station located on Montauk, Long Island. The project’s purpose was, purportedly, to develop psychological warfare techniques and conduct “exotic” research, including exploring the concept of time travel. Believers say that people were kidnapped at said U.S. Air Force base and subjected to mind control and time travel experiments. And extraterrestrials all actively participated in it.

Clearly nobody has been able to actually prove these allegations and all that’s left of this “Montauk facility,” which is now a state park, are the above-ground remnants of the original Air Force base. According to a document issued by the Air Force Historical Studies office, the Montauk base, then known as Camp Hero, was decommissioned in the early 1980s.

The quaint town of Montauk is a small seaside resort community on the tip of Long Island that draws vacationers to its shores every year. Camp Hero, located a short distance outside of Montauk, has origina as far back as the Revolutionary War, during which it was used to test military cannons. Later, during World War II, Camp Hero operated as a coastal defense installation against any possible Nazi intrusions into America.


Three men, Alfred Bielek, Stewart Swerdlow and Preston Nichols, claim that Camp Hero instead ended up as an underground site for the execution of scientific atrocities and unethical medical experimentation.


Bielek, a retired electrical engineer, maintains he was part of the mysterious Philadelphia Experiment, where in 1943, the U.S. Navy reportedly attempted to assemble a small destroyer undetectable to radar. The test ended in disastrous results, including the ship vanishing from the Philadelphia Navy yard and — “allegedly”– traveling through time.

According to Bielek’s story, he was uprooted, abducted, from Philadelphia, and transported ahead in time. He claims extraterrestrials were responsible for the technology used in this so-called Philadelphia Experiment. He also affirms he was recruited in 1970 to work on mind control and time travel projects at Montauk Facility.


Swerdlow’s story involves being kidnapped as a teenager from his Long Island, N.Y., home, taken to the Montauk base, and subjected to a variety of experiments.
Swerdlow recalls being subjected to horrific experimentation while at the Montauk facility.

“Beatings, a lot of torture, electrical shock, burials, near-drownings,” Swerdlow asserts. “They’d bring you to the point of death, and then they would save you, and the person doing this would be your rescuer or god, and would say, ‘I’m the one that saved you and remember that.’ And that became your handler — your programmer.”

He insists, “The walls were very damp, oozing water, so it appeared to be deep underground or even underwater. I was always on this cold, hard table. Sometimes there’d be other people around, either my age or older, and electrodes were put into me and injections.”


All three men profess to have seen first-hand extraterrestrials while employed at the underground Camp Hero facility.

“Well, there were quite a number of aliens at Montauk,” asserts Bielek. “Some were there on a semi-permanent basis. A lot of them were just visitors that came in and looked at what they wanted to see and went back home. There were little grays there, which I suspected were degenerated humans from out of the future. Large gray aliens (which are a different species) were also at Montauk, and they were highly intelligent.”


Nichols, like Bielek, was an electrical engineer at the time. He says he worked with Bielek in the mind control and psychic aspects of the Montauk Project.

“There were definitely alien beings at Montauk,” Nichols claims. “We had the little grays and the larger grays as well as a variety of reptilian beings. The large grays didn’t want anything to do with me because they couldn’t reach me telepathically. When I entered a room they would leave. They were the strangest thing that I ever saw. At that point, I was beginning to doubt my own sanity.”

And Swerdlow also avows an alien presence at Montauk: “Most of the time my interaction was with human beings, but I did come into close contact with alien beings. I did see, occasionally, intelligent reptilian humanoid beings as well as gray aliens who were once human beings but were physically altered as a result of degeneration and radiation toxins in their system. Most of them communicated with mental telepathy.”


In addition to igniting the flame that is Stranger Things, the myths, or realities, of Montauk Facility have also served as a basis for an upcoming film, “Montauk Chronicles,” written by Christopher Garetano.

Garetano shot much of his project at the actual site of Camp Hero.

“When you walk through the area now, you see this giant, imposing radar tower that still stands,” Garetano told AOL Weird News. “The park currently has strange regulations: You’re not supposed to use any radio equipment there and you are cautioned about unexploded ordnance. While filming my movie here, I couldn’t understand why people are allowed to walk around a park where there are still unexploded devices or why radio equipment isn’t allowed if the radar tower is now defunct and the entire base is completely non-operational.”


That question may be answered by a brochure issued in 2001 for visitors to Camp Hero. It includes a section called Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) Warnings: “Please follow the following steps if you think you have come across Unexploded Ordnance:”

  • Never transmit radio frequencies (walkie talkies, citizen’s band radio) near UXO.
  • Never attempt to touch, move or disturb UXO.
  • Avoid any area where UXO is located.

Garetano has pondered the ordinance’s bizarre warnings, stating it’s “strange that they don’t want you to use radio devices that may set off unexploded bombs, yet they allow the public to walk around a potentially high danger area!”

In addition to the enormous, looming, abandoned radar tower at the Camp Hero site, there are also giant doors, or bunkers, cemented and sealed into the side of various hills dotting the forest area. Also strewn throughout the wooded park are numerous apparatuses that appear to be above-ground manhole covers.

“These are entrances that obviously go down into something,” Garetano stated in the interview. “There are claims from people that these are entrances to underground tunnel systems that ran beneath the military base that allegedly would take you to the true entrance of the facility.”


Among the unusual reports included in the assertions made by the individuals who insist their experience of the Montauk events is a device they called “The Montauk Chair.” According to these alleged participants, a powerful psychic would sit in this specified chair and could then inexplicably materialize objects out of thin air and transform them into physical reality.


After spending countless hours with the men who are the subjects of his film, Garetano says he didn’t always believe their stories and suppositions.

“At first I didn’t. These men have not benefited financially — they didn’t gain anything from this. And they’ve endured ridicule as they maintain their story,” Garetano said.


As for Netflix’s hit show Stranger Things, the creators were inspired by the repressed memories of those who survived the Montauk horrors:

“Described as a love letter to the ’80s classics that captivated a generation, the series is set in 1980 Montauk, Long Island, where a young boy vanishes into thin air. As friends, family and local police search for answers, they are drawn into an extraordinary mystery involving top-secret government experiments, terrifying supernatural forces and one very strange little girl.”

An article published by Thrillist highlights a man named Preston Nichols, who also claims to have memories of being involved in the experiment known as the “Montauk Chair,” which, as I mentioned before, purportedly manifested the ability to initiate and amplify psychic powers.

An excerpt from Nichols’ book “The Montauk Project: Experiments in Time” describes one specific experiment he experienced at the facility:

“The first experiment was called ‘The Seeing Eye.’ With a lock of person’s hair or other appropriate object in his hand, Duncan [Cameron, supposed psychic] could concentrate on the person and be able to see as if he was seeing through their eyes, hearing through their ears, and feeling through their body. He could actually see through other people anywhere on the planet.”

Sound familiar? Do any esoteric mental images come to mind? Maybe an Upside Down portal?

And in this excerpt from Nichols’ book he writes how Duncan summoned a monster while on the chair:

“We finally decided we’d had enough of the whole experiment. The contingency program was activated by someone approaching Duncan while he was in the chair and simply whispering ‘The time is now.’ At this moment, he let loose a monster from his subconscious. And the transmitter actually portrayed a hairy monster. It was big, hairy, hungry and nasty. But it didn’t appear underground in the null point. It showed up somewhere on the base. It would eat anything it could find. And it smashed everything in sight. Several different people saw it, but almost everyone described a different beast.”

MKULTRA

The series Stranger Things also echoes another governmental project–this one indubitably somewhat legitimate, although details vary–known as Project MK-ULTRA, the CIA’s secretive, illegal program. Throughout its operation, the government carried out scientific research on human subjects. During the Cold War, the CIA subjected ill-informed patients to experiments with drugs, most notoriously LSD. Some argue the program was for the sole purpose of mind control.

Project MKUltra, also referred to as the CIA Mind Control Program, was the code name given to a program and implementation of experiments performed–at times illegally–on human subjects. The program was designed and enforced by the United States Central Intelligence Agency. The intention of these experiments on humans was to identify and develop drugs and procedures for use during interrogations and torture, so as to weaken the victim to force confessions through “mind control.”


The project began in the early 1950’s and was officially sanctioned in 1953. It was subsequently reduced in scope in 1964, further curtailed in 1967, and officially halted in 1973. The program engaged in an extraordinary number of illegal activities, including the use of unwitting U.S. and Canadian citizens as test subjects, which obviously led to widespread controversy regarding the project’s legitimacy.

MKUltra employed numerous methodologies to manipulate people’s mental states and alter brain functions: the surreptitious administration of drugs (especially LSD) and other chemicals, hypnosis, sensory deprivation, isolation and verbal abuse, as well as other forms of psychological torture.


The scope of Project MKUltra was notably broad, with research performed at 80 institutions, including 44 colleges and universities, and even at multiple hospitals, prisons, and pharmaceutical companies. The CIA operated through these institutions using front organizations. Yet top officials at these institutions were oftentimes aware of the CIA’s involvement. As the US Supreme Court later noted in CIA v. Sims 471 U.S. 159 (1985) MKULTRA was concerned with:

“The research and development of chemical, biological, and radiological materials capable of employment in clandestine operations to control human behavior.”

The program consisted of 149 subprojects, which the Agency contracted out to various universities, research foundations, and other similar institutions. At least 80 institutions and 185 private researchers participated and because the Agency funded MKUltra indirectly, many of the participating individuals were unaware that they were under the direction of the CIA.

Despite the Supreme Court ultimately upholding the CIA’s insistence that sources’ names could be redacted for their protection, it nonetheless validated the existence of MKULTRA to be used in future court cases and confirmed that for 14 years the CIA performed clandestine experiments on humans to study human behavior.


So, between 1953 and 1966, the CIA financed a wide-ranging project, code-named MKULTRA, which was concerned specifically with the research and development of chemical, biological, and radiological materials. These materials were to be utilized in clandestine operations to control human behavior but the existence of Project MKUltra wasn’t brought to public attention until 1975 when the Church Committee of the U.S. Congress, and a Gerald Ford commission began investigating CIA activities within the United States.

Investigative efforts were, however, hampered by the fact that, in 1973, CIA Director Richard Helms ordered all MKUltra files destroyed. As a result, the Church Committee and Rockefeller Commission investigations were forced to rely exclusively on the sworn testimony of direct participants and on the relatively small number of documents that survived Helms’ order that all evidence of MKUltra’s existence be destroyed.


In 1977, a Freedom of Information Act request uncovered a cache of 20,000 documents relating to project MKUltra, leading to Senate hearings in the last few months of the year. Interestingly, in July 2001, some surviving information regarding MKUltra was finally declassified.

As mentioned previously, 44 American universities, 15 research foundations or chemical or pharmaceutical companies, 12 hospitals or clinics, and three prisons are known to have participated in the project that was MKUltra.


In case you were wondering the origins of the project’s intentionally obscure CIA cryptonym. MKUltra is made up of the digraph MK, meaning the project was sponsored by the agency’s Technical Services Staff,) followed by the word Ultra (which previously had been used to designate the uttermost secret classification of World War II intelligence.)


Headed by Sidney Gottlieb, the MKUltra project began on April 13, 1953, on the order of CIA director Allen Welsh Dulles. Its aim was to develop mind-controlling drugs for use against the Soviets, largely in response to alleged Soviet, Chinese, and North Korean use of mind control techniques on U.S. prisoners of war in Korea. The CIA thought the methods were novel ones and hoped to use similar techniques on their own captives. The CIA was also interested in developing the capacity to manipulate foreign leaders with such techniques and would later invent profuse schemes in order to intoxicate and mentally override Fidel Castro.

Experiments were too often conducted without the subjects’ knowledge or consent. Further, many academic researchers who were funded through grants from the CIA’s front organizations were unaware of the manipulative purposes of their work.


The project’s quintessential goal was to produce the ideal “truth drug” to use during the interrogations of suspected Soviet spies during the Cold War. However, the program’s intentions generalized to explore any other possibilities of human mind control.

Because most MKUltra records were deliberately destroyed in 1973 by order of then CIA director Richard Helms, it has been difficult, if not impossible, for investigators to gain a thorough and definitive understanding of the more than 150 individually funded research sub-projects sponsored by MKUltra and other related CIA programs.


Returning to the project’s birth, MKUltra materialized during a period of, what Rupert Cornwell described as, “paranoia” within the CIA; the U.S. had lost its nuclear monopoly and fear of Communism was at its height. James Jesus Angleton, head of CIA counter-intelligence, postulated that the organization’s protective shell had been infiltrated by a mole at the highest level.

So, the CIA poured millions of dollars into studies examining methods of manipulating and controlling the mind to enhance their ability to extract information from resistant subjects during interrogation.


One 1955 MKUltra document gives an indication of the size and range of the effort; this document refers to the study of an assortment of mind-altering substances described as follows:

  1. Substances which will promote illogical thinking and impulsiveness to the point where the recipient would be discredited in public.
  2. Substances which increase the efficiency of mentation and perception.
  3. Materials which will cause the victim to age faster/slower in maturity.
  4. Materials which will promote the intoxicating effect of alcohol.
  5. Materials which will produce the signs and symptoms of recognized diseases in a reversible way so that they may be used for malingering, etc.
  6. Materials which will cause temporary/permanent brain damage and loss of memory.
  7. Substances which will enhance the ability of individuals to withstand privation, torture and coercion during interrogation and so-called “brain-washing”.
  8. Materials and physical methods which will produce amnesia for events preceding and during their use.
  9. Physical methods of producing shock and confusion over extended periods of time and capable of surreptitious use.
  10. Substances which produce physical disablement such as paralysis of the legs, acute anemia, etc.
  11. Substances which will produce a chemical that can cause blisters.
  12. Substances which alter personality structure in such a way that the tendency of the recipient to become dependent upon another person is enhanced.
  13. A material which will cause mental confusion of such a type that the individual under its influence will find it difficult to maintain a fabrication under questioning.
  14. Substances which will lower the ambition and general working efficiency of men when administered in undetectable amounts.
  15. Substances which promote weakness or distortion of the eyesight or hearing faculties, preferably without permanent effects.
  16. A knockout pill which can surreptitiously be administered in drinks, food, cigarettes, as an aerosol, etc., which will be safe to use, provide a maximum of amnesia, and be suitable for use by agent types on an ad hoc basis.
  17. A material which can be surreptitiously administered by the above routes and which in very small amounts will make it impossible for a person to perform physical activity.

CIA documents indicate that “chemical, biological and radiological” methods were investigated for the purpose of mind control by MKUltra . An estimated $10 million USD (roughly $87.5 million adjusted for inflation) or more was spent in total.


LSD

Early CIA efforts focused on LSD9/589, which later came to dominate many of MKUltra’s programs. The CIA aimed to investigate whether or not they could make Soviet spies defect against their will and whether the Soviets could do the same to the CIA’s own operatives.

Once Project MKUltra officially commenced in April 1953, experiments included administering LSD to mentally ill patients, prisoners, drug addicts and prostitutes, or as one agency officer put it simply, “people who could not fight back.”

LSD, among other drugs, was usually administered without the subject’s knowledge or informed consent, an explicit violation of the Nuremberg Code (a code drafted to establish international human rights laws and signed by the US.)

The aim of administering such medications was to discover drugs which would irresistibly evoke deeply seated confessions or wipe a subject’s mind clean–deleting unwanted information–and subsequently re-programming the individual as “a robot agent.”

Some subjects’ participation was in fact consensual but in these cases they were specifically singled out for even more extreme experiments. In one case, seven volunteers in Kentucky were given LSD for 77 consecutive days.


Eventually, LSD was dismissed by MKUltra’s researchers as too “unpredictable” in its results. They gave up the notion that LSD was “the secret that was going to unlock the universe.” Nevertheless, the drug still remained within the CIA’s arsenal of potential interrogative methods of operation.


By 1962 the CIA and the army had developed a series of “super hallucinogens,” including the highly touted BZ which was thought to hold greater promise as a mind control weapon. This resulted in many academics and private researchers withdrawing their support and ultimately LSD research became less of a priority altogether.


HYPNOSIS

Declassified MKUltra documents prove that hypnosis was studied as  early as the 1950’s. Experimental goals included: the creation of “hypnotically induced anxieties,” “hypnotically increasing ability to learn and recall complex written matter,” investigating hypnosis and polygraph examinations, “hypnotically increasing ability to observe and recall complex arrangements of physical objects,” and studying the “relationship of personality to susceptibility to hypnosis.”

Experiments were conducted with drug induced hypnosis and with anterograde and retrograde amnesia while under the influence of such drugs.


DEATHS

Given the CIA’s purposeful destruction of most records, its failure to follow informed consent protocols with thousands of participants, the uncontrolled nature of the experiments, and the total lack of follow-up data, the exhaustive impact of MKUltra’s experimentations on human subjects, including resultant deaths, may never be known.

However some deaths associated with involvement in Project MKUltra’s experimental process have been reported. The most notable case is that of Frank Olson.

Olson, a United States Army biochemist and biological weapons researcher, was given LSD without his knowledge or consent in November, 1953, as part of a CIA experiment. One week later, while still under the influence of LSD, Olson committed suicide by leaping out of a window.

The CIA physician who was assigned to monitor Olson during these “trips” claimed to have been asleep in another bed in a New York City hotel room when Olson exited the window and fell thirteen stories to his death.

In 1953, Olson’s death was declared a suicide following a severe psychotic episode. The CIA’s own internal investigation concluded that the head of MKUltra, CIA chemist Sidney Gottlieb, had conducted the LSD experiment with Olson’s prior knowledge, despite the other men taking part in the experiment later asserting that they had not been informed as to the exact nature of the drug until approximately 20 minutes after its ingestion. The report further suggested that Gottlieb was nonetheless due a reprimand, as he had failed to take into account Olson’s previously diagnosed suicidal tendencies, which clearly might have been exacerbated by the administration of LSD to Mr. Olson.


The Olson family disputes the official version of events. They maintain that Frank Olson was murdered. According to their statements, Olson had become a security risk and was eliminated out of fear he might divulge state secrets associated with highly classified CIA programs, about many of which he had direct personal knowledge.

A few days before his death, Frank Olson quit his position as acting chief of the Special Operations Division at Detrick, Maryland (later Fort Detrick) because of a severe moral crisis concerning the nature of his biological weapons research. Among Olson’s concerns were the development of assassination materials used by the CIA. The CIA’s use of biological warfare materials in covert operations, experimentation with biological weapons in populated areas, collaboration with former Nazi scientists under Operation Paperclip, LSD mind-control research, and the use of psychoactive drugs during “terminal” interrogations under a program code-named Project ARTICHOKE.

Further, ensuing forensic evidence conflicted with the official version of events; when Olson’s body was exhumed in 1994, cranial injuries indicated that Olson had been knocked unconscious before exiting the window. The medical examiner subsequently declared Olson’s death a “homicide.”

In 1975, Olson’s family received a $750,000 settlement from the U.S. government and formal apologies from President Gerald Ford and CIA Director William Colby, though their apologies were limited to informed consent issues concerning Olson’s ingestion of LSD.

On 28 November 2012, the Olson family filed suit against the U.S. federal government for the wrongful death of Frank Olson.

A 2010 book by H. P. Albarelli Jr. alleged that the 1951 Pont-Saint-Esprit mass poisoning was part of MKDELTA, that Olson was involved in that event, and that he was eventually murdered by the CIA. However, academic sources attribute the incident to ergot poisoning through a local baker.


MKULTRA AND INFORMED CONSENT 

The revelations about the CIA and the Army prompted a number of subjects or their survivors to file lawsuits against the federal government for conducting experiments without the explicit consent of its subjects, which is required in all medical practice. Although the government aggressively, and sometimes successfully, sought to avoid legal liability, several plaintiffs did receive compensation through court order, out-of-court settlement, or acts of Congress. As previously mentioned, Frank Olson’s family received $750,000 by a special act of Congress, and both President Ford and CIA director William Colby met with Olson’s family to apologize publicly.

Previously, the CIA and the Army actively and successfully sought to withhold incriminating information regarding MKUltra, even whilst secretly providing compensation to the families.


The medical trials at Nuremberg in 1947 deeply impressed upon the world that experimentation with unknowing human subjects is morally and legally unacceptable. The United States Military Tribunal established the Nuremberg Code as a standard against which to judge German scientists who experimented with human subjects. In defiance of this principle, military intelligence officials began surreptitiously testing chemical and biological materials, including LSD through Project MKUltra.

Justice Sandra Day O’Connor wrote:

“As Justice Brennan observes, the United States played an instrumental role in the criminal prosecution of Nazi officials who experimented with human subjects during the Second World War, and the standards that the Nuremberg Military Tribunals developed to judge the behavior of the defendants stated that the ‘voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential … to satisfy moral, ethical, and legal concepts.’ If this principle is violated, the very least that society can do is to see that the victims are compensated, as best they can be, by the perpetrators.”

In separate posts I will discuss the significance of informed consent in medical practice and its development through historical, often atrocious, events.


THE AFTERMATH OF MKULTRA

At his retirement in 1972, Gottlieb dismissed his entire effort for the CIA’s MKUltra program as useless. Although the CIA insists that MKUltra-type experiments have been abandoned, some CIA observers, disturbingly, insist there is little reason to believe it does not continue to operate today under a different set of acronyms.

Victor Marchetti, author and 14-year CIA veteran, stated in various interviews that the CIA routinely conducted disinformation campaigns and that CIA mind control research has in fact continued to remain a governmental experiment. In a 1977 interview, Marchetti specifically called the CIA’s claim that MKUltra was abandoned a “cover story.”


BACK TO STRANGER THINGS

Despite the series’ clear reflection of two separate but not entirely dissimilar apparent events, although the disputed legitimacy of each vary, the creators of Stranger Things, Matt and Ross Duffer, have been strangely coy about any connection the show’s theme has to the Montauk Project (or any other potential government covert experimental operations.) Instead, they have only remarked that ditching the original “Montauk” title was “very painful.”


Sounds strange to me. Have stranger things occurred? Probably. But this is definitely one of the strangest. Scientifically speaking.

What else might be stranger? Winona Ryder and her facial expressions…but that’s off-topic.

WHY HAVING A MENTAL ILLNESS DOESN’T MAKE YOU “MENTAL”

ALONE IN A CROWDED WAITING ROOM

First, you’re not alone; and I don’t mean that in some bullshit condescending cliche way.

In fact not only are you not alone but you’re surrounded daily by others in similar emotional, social, financial, familial, professional states not unlike you’re own. You probably walk right by them in the mornings or sit next to them in traffic on the freeway.


Let’s begin with some statistics (remember this is a medical blog written by someone with a scientific, evidence-based mindset—who can also put sentences together. Plus statistics help put complicated issues into perspective) then I’ll share my own personal struggles that might alleviate any pain you yourself might be struggling with. Even if you’ve been fortunate enough to have never personally experienced depression or crippling anxiety or panic attacks or thought-racing or impulsivity or relationship issues, you should know how fortunate you are and you SHOULD educate yourself about mental illness and develop empathy and compassion for those who have struggled with mental paralysis.

Also know that if you are struggling mentally, psychiatrically, this doesn’t place you at the bottom of the totem pole. Some of the mostly successful members of society—leaders, parents, politicians, entrepreneurs, doctors, lawyers, business owners, teachers—suffer daily from some form of mental illness. But it doesn’t have to define you. Just as Diabetes Mellitus Type I doesn’t define someone who needs Insulin daily.


OK so the statistics: Mental Health in Numbers.

First, 43.8 million adults experience mental illness each year. This means:

  • 1 in 5 American adults struggle with mental illness annually
  • 1 in 25 (nearly 10 million people) adults in America live with a serious mental illness

Prevalence by diagnosis:

  • 1 in 100 (2.4 million) adults in the US suffer from schizophrenia
  • 6.1 million adults in America (2.6%) live with bipolar disorder
  • 16 million American adults live with major depression–this represents 6.9% of the population
  • 42 million adults in the US (18.1% of all US adults) battle anxiety disorders daily

These numbers are significant. What are the consequences and impact of this high prevalence of adults struggling with mental illness?

  • #1: Depression is the leading cause of disability worldwide, and is a major contributor to the global burden of disease.
  • -$193 BILLION: Serious mental illness costs America $193.2 BILLION in lost earnings each year.
  • 90%: percentage of those who die by suicide have an underlying mental illness.
  • #10: Suicide is the 10th leading cause of death in the United States.

Are these Americans being treated? What help are they receiving?

  • 60%: the percentage of Americans with a mental illness who DID NOT receive mental health services the previous year.

Why the stigma? Why are we isolating those already isolated? Fear? Disregard? Inability to relate? Using them as scapegoats? Projecting our own problems onto the most vulnerable individuals in our society? Confusion or miseducation about mental illness?

During medical school in my third year, on rounds, whether during my internal medicine rotation or my surgery rotation, I saw interns and residents recoil when we learned a patient with a mental illness had been admitted and assigned to our team. They often sighed and exchanged glances amongst each other. I get it–they aren’t psychiatrists. In these other specialties, physicians are not trained to deal with mental illness and, to them, it “gets in the way” of tackling the medical conditions that do fall within their realm of expertise. What I didn’t endorse or tolerate was the occasional laughter in the resident rooms or swapping of “crazy patient” stories. It bothered me. It bothered me because I’ve struggled with mental illness and my mother suffers from Borderline Personality Disorder. How dare you chuckle and take pleasure from someone else’s suffering. It infuriated me.


This should NOT stop you from seeking help. Again, this blog is a critique of the medical system, its shortcomings, what improvements should be made, and a blunt description of the reality of living in the medical world–what med students do and think, what residents do and think, etc.

You should reach out for help if you’re struggling with anything that is keeping you from becoming the best version of you. Or that’s how I convinced myself to get the help I needed. I felt I wasn’t living life, I was trapped, and I was missing out. I didn’t want to look back in 20 years and feel that life had passed me by because I was too afraid of what others thought of me.

There are physicians who will listen and do sincerely care; many aren’t just putting on a show during your visit and rolling their eyes and laughing when you leave. You just need to do the research. Find the psychiatrists who take the time to listen to you. They are out there.


The anxiety started in medical school during my first year. It came on so suddenly that it was like being hit by a giant wave you didn’t see coming, at night, when you’re waist-high in the ocean. Standardized Patient Examinations were every Friday. Basically, my medical school (and every other US medical school) hires actors and pays them to pretend to be patients afflicted with something we had learned about the previous week. The mock appointments took place in rooms that were set-up to look like your standard family practice examination room–with a table, a stool, a sink, cotton balls, the works. One caveat: in each room (there were about 10 of these pseudo-doctor rooms) a camera was positioned in the farthest corner of the room, opposite from the door you entered through to begin your theatrical performance. Behind these rooms was a larger room and in that room sat our professors, watching us through the cameras, watching us walk through a typical physician-patient “appointment.”

I didn’t see it this way. I saw the room as a stage, the camera as judgment, and knew there was an audience watching me through that camera waiting for me to fuck up, or critiquing my every word and movement, and on that second Friday of my first year I panicked. The standardized patient got out of character and, in addition to being surprisingly different in demeanor from the patient she was playing, helped me sit down on a plastic chair against the wall, my head down between my knees.

it was awful. I was shaking, my tongue went numb from hyperventilating, and all I could think about was that video camera and then then the thoughts of overwhelming embarrassment began to infect my mind. I felt like it would never end. The thoughts just kept racing: “what if this keeps going? What if they think I can’t be a doctor now? They are probably all watching. I fucked up. I’m screwed.” And the thoughts made the panic worse and I had to think of my favorite Bob Dylan song and tried to sing it in my head to distract the flood of thoughts that were keeping me paralyzed in that chair. Anything to “Ativan” the thoughts in my head.

With the help of a classmate who said, “don’t worry I was feeling the exact same way,” the panic dissipated, but slowly. I left the building as quickly as I could, my head down in shame, avoiding eye contact with everyone I passed. I wanted to get home, be alone, and cry. So I sped-walked home, re-playing what had happened over and over in my head like a tape recording, unlocked my apartment door, locked it, tossed my books on the couch then sat on the floor and cried for an hour.


All I could think about the entire rest of the evening, well into the night, the next morning, the next day, the next night was: this is going to happen again. And just as quickly as an intramuscular injection of epinephrine fuels the heart to the point of tachycardia (fast beating,) so did the anticipation of future panic attacks instigate their monstrous reappearance.


I later learned, through a psychiatrist and once I entered third year and completed my psychiatry rotation, that I was indeed not alone. What had happened to me happens to thousands of people everyday and is a classified disorder in DSM IV (and now V)–the Bible of psychiatry.

Panic Disorder. An anxiety disorder. DSM V is the system psychiatrists use to diagnose mental health disorders–basically the psychiatry rule book. Panic disorder–this type of anxiety disorder–is based primarily on the occurrence of panic attacks, which are recurrent and often unexpected. Further, at least one attack is followed by one month or more of the person fearing that they will have more attacks. This causes the victim to change his or her behavior, which often includes avoiding situations that might induce an attack.

Since panic attacks are key to a panic disorder diagnosis, they are specific and well defined for psychiatrists. This is where the updates in DSM-5 are significant. The previous version classified panic attacks into three categories: situationally bound/cued, situationally predisposed, or unexpected/uncued. DSM-5 has simplified it into two very clear categories: expected and unexpected panic attacks.

Expected panic attacks are those associated with a specific fear, like that of flying or spiders or clowns or birds. Unexpected panic attacks have no apparent trigger or cue, and may appear to occur out of the blue–great for me right?

According to DSM-5, a panic attack is characterized by four or more of the following symptoms:

  • Palpitations. In essence, a rapidly beating heart, which is what I had experienced.
  • Sweating
  • Trembling or shaking. Again, something else that incapacitated my body that day with the camera watching like Big Brother.
  • Shortness of breath or smothering. Yup that happened too.
  • A feeling of choking. That’s what it felt like when my tongue went numb.
  • Chest pain
  • Nausea or stomach pain
  • Dizziness or feeling like you might pass out. Check. That’s why I had to sit in that plastic chair, my body bent in half, my head below my knees.
  • Feelings of unreality (derealization) or being detached from oneself (depersonalization.) I’ll be honest, I don’t even know how you can classify that, it seems so subjective. But I definitely didn’t feel present in the moment; all I could think about were those cameras and everyone watching.
  • Fear of losing control or going crazy. I didn’t think I was going to go crazy. I just thought I was crazy.
  • Fear of dying. This is a big one. This is what a lot of people feel when they experience a panic attack. But I knew it was a panic attack. I knew I wasn’t going to die. I just didn’t know when it would end or if it would end.
  • Numbness or tingling sensations (paresthesias.) That too. My fingertips tingled and I couldn’t feel anything below my knees. Once the panic started to fade back into the shadows it felt like I had been walking on tiny little pinpricks, like walking on recently mowed grass.
  • Chills or hot flushes.

It’s important to note: the presence of fewer than four of the above symptoms may be considered a limited-symptom panic attack and agoraphobia (or social anxiety, which I’ll discuss in another post) now stands alone in a separate classification. I will share, though, that after I had experienced several panic attacks over the course of the few weeks following the initial attack I did develop agoraphobia. Who wouldn’t? I could never predict these attacks and the embarrassment that followed them made me want to hide in a darkened padded cell, locked from the inside and me with the key. After all, I was crazy. Wasn’t I? I must be.


What I went through to obtain treatment for these attacks was horrendous and only added to my anxiety. I did feel alone. No one–except that one classmate that one day–ever sympathized with me nor did any classmate ever open up to me about their struggles with mental illness (even when I found out secondhand or by a slip of their own tongue.) It was hush-hush. I felt like the only medical student in the world with panic disorder. But I later learned I wasn’t.


So the panic attacks turned into agoraphobia and they also congealed into depression. In future posts I will discuss the road I took to finding treatment and getting my panic attacks under control. I will also share with you the agoraphobia I experienced and, finally, the ever deepening, dark, cold, empty pit of depression I eventually fell in to and didn’t even want to find a way out of.


If you need help now, you probably already know the numbers to call. I’m going to spare you that pre-recorded sales pitch. But I will say: any reader can contact me anytime if you’d like to discuss anything you may be dealing with. You know the drill: “Menu” then “Contact Me.” There’s my email address: I’m always online. I’ll be the med school dropout non-MD consultant who will always listen.